Berlin 2015 – scientific programme
Parts | Days | Selection | Search | Updates | Downloads | Help
O: Fachverband Oberflächenphysik
O 85: Frontiers of Electronic Structure Theory: Many-Body Effects on the Nano-Scale VI
O 85.11: Talk
Thursday, March 19, 2015, 17:45–18:00, MA 004
Comparison of two self-consistent GW schemes — •Peter Koval1, Dietrich Foerster2, and Daniel Sanchez-Portal1,3 — 1Donostia International Physics Center, San Sebastián, Spain — 2Laboratoire Ondes et Matiére d’Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France — 3Material Physics Center, San Sebastián, Spain
GW approximation (GWA) as a competitor of DFT provides a better description of electronic structure in several respects. However, a GW calculation is more expensive than similar DFT calculation. This fact contributed to a wide usage of simpler calculations based on GWA (SEX, COSEX, plasmon-pole approximations etc.) This manyfold of approximations hampers a non-biased evaluation of merits of GWA to describe the electronic correlations. We produced a rigorous GW implementation where the only approximation is the use of localized orbitals [1]. The usage of spectral functions allowed us to realize two self-consistent GW schemes: scGW [2] and qsGW [3] in one code [4]. Furthermore, we used all-electron Gaussian basis sets that allows for a coherent comparison with quantum chemistry methods. We use coupled-cluster methods CCSD and CCSD(T) as reference and compare ionization potentials of 15 molecules. The calculations show trends in scGW and qsGW and give hints on possible sources of discrepancies/directions towards improving GWA. [1] D. Foerster, P. Koval, D. Sánchez-Portal, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 074105 (2011); [2] L. Hedin, J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 11, R489 (1999); [3] S. V. Faleev, M. van Schilfgaarde, T. Kotani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126406 (2004); [2] P. Koval, D. Foerster, D. Sánchez-Portal, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155417 (2014).